Three Concepts of Defeasible Permission
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent different concepts of defeasible permission. Special attention is paid in particular to permissive norms that work as exceptions to opposite obligations.
منابع مشابه
Computing Strong and Weak Permissions in Defeasible Logic
In this paper we propose an extension of Defeasible Logic to represent and compute three concepts of defeasible permission. In particular, we discuss different types of explicit permissive norms that work as exceptions to opposite obligations. Moreover, we show how strong permissions can be represented both with, and without introducing a new consequence relation for inferring conclusions from ...
متن کاملNICHOLAS ASHER and DANIEL BONEVAC FREE CHOICE PERMISSION IS STRONG PERMISSION
Free choice permission, a crucial test case concerning the semantics/ pragmatics boundary, usually receives a pragmatic treatment. But its pragmatic features follow from its semantics. We observe that free choice inferences are defeasible, and defend a semantics of free choice permission as strong permission expressed in terms of a modal conditional in a nonmonotonic logic.
متن کاملTowards Defeasible SROIQ
We present a decidable extension of the Description Logic SROIQ that supports defeasible reasoning in the KLM tradition, and extends it through the introduction of defeasible roles. The semantics of the resulting DL dSROIQ extends the classical semantics with a parameterised preference order on binary relations in a domain of interpretation. This allows for the use of defeasible roles in comple...
متن کاملMaking Quantification Relevant Again - the Case of Defeasible EL_\bot
Defeasible Description Logics (DDLs) extend Description Logics with defeasible concept inclusions. Reasoning in DDLs often employs rational or relevant closure according to the (propositional) KLM postulates. If in DDLs with quantification a defeasible subsumption relationship holds between concepts, this relationship might also hold if these concepts appear in existential restrictions. Such ne...
متن کاملMaking Quantification Relevant Again
Defeasible Description Logics (DDLs) extend Description Logics with defeasible concept inclusions. Reasoning in DDLs often employs rational or relevant closure according to the (propositional) KLM postulates. If in DDLs with quantification a defeasible subsumption relationship holds between concepts, this relationship might also hold if these concepts appear in existential restrictions. Such ne...
متن کامل